...Not the kind of wheel you fall asleep at...

Deja-Doo-Doo


I took this about an hour ago from the roof of my apartment here in South Korea...



* * * *


And onto unrelated topics...

I watched Soylent Green this weekend and actually found it quite interesting. Amusingly, it was set in the "futuristic" year of 2002, complete with rampant overpopulation and even-more-processed-than-McD's kinds of foods. But what REALLY interested me was this...

In the middle of the 1970's, the United States of America was still in full swing with its anti-Vietnam turmoil. Dissent was rife and individuals were in thrall not only to the fears concerning U.S. involvement but also the inner-political turmoil that was causing the U.S. to eat away at itself. The rampant success of SOYLENT GREEN [1973] in this time period is not so surprising given its quite obvious commentary on cannibalism and American self-destruction.

Charlton Heston is a 'troubled' cop who has a problem with subjugation of any kind. He has a problem with not being able to get his hands on a piece of fresh fruit to eat, with being surrounded by overpopulation, with being surprised. Mostly he does not like being forced to eat human flesh. Human flesh "bugs" him. At first blush this could be taken as a normal anti-cannibalistic pic where fear of cannibalism is visible in the guise of "Soylent Green"; and while this is a valid analysis, it does not preclude all other analyses.

Charlton Heston is enraged because he has learned that "Soylent Green is people." The "normal" food he was raised with turns to bitter gall when faced with the harsh reality that he must kowtow instead to mass quantities of human flesh being fed to him and the rest of New York's population, unbeknownst to all of them. The rage of this realization coupled with the death of his "father figure" result in a manifestation of liminal uncertainty. He is just one more indication of American's slow-consumption of it's own best resource--its people. But nothing is resolved, leaving all questions in need of being answered, and leaving us hauntingly asking: Is Soylent Green people? Is Vietnam people? Is Soylent Green Vietnam? Is Charlton Heston EVER gonna be able to not be completely over-the-top dramatic?

Yet Charlton Heston cannot handle this realization either. He is left screaming to the world "Soylent Green is people!"--we are the cause of our own mass downfall. While the plot itself might seem rather straightforward in promoting anti-cannibalistic acts, it remains an allegorical warning that we will be the source of our own destruction, and that WE SHOULD NOT EAT OTHER PEOPLE.

A recap; Charlton Heston [as the "individual" in America] cannot cope with the realization that he is essentially the source of his own downfall and that the American population [as "America"] is slowly gnawing away at its own right leg, not even realizing that it's chewing on ITSELF for sustenance. The fact that SOYLENT GREEN was so hugely successful is evidence enough that anti-cannibalistic and anti-Vietnam kooks were right on the money and that America was scooting its ass along the path of self-destruction even back in the 1970's.

I report, you decide.



-------




0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home





















































































































































































































































February 2012 * May 2011 * March 2011 * February 2011 * November 2010 * September 2010 * August 2010 * July 2010 * June 2010 * May 2010 * April 2010 * March 2010 * February 2010 * January 2010 * December 2009 * November 2009 * October 2009 * September 2009 * August 2009 * July 2009 * June 2009 * May 2009 * April 2009 * March 2009 * February 2009 * January 2009 * December 2008 * November 2008 * October 2008 * September 2008 * August 2008 * July 2008 * June 2008 * May 2008 * April 2008 * March 2008 * February 2008 * January 2008 * December 2007 * November 2007 * October 2007 * September 2007 * August 2007 * July 2007 * June 2007 * May 2007 * April 2007 * March 2007 * February 2007 * January 2007 * December 2006 * November 2006 * October 2006 * September 2006 * August 2006 * July 2006 * June 2006 * May 2006 * April 2006 * March 2006 * February 2006 * January 2006 * December 2005 * November 2005 * October 2005 * September 2005 * August 2005 * July 2005 * June 2005 * May 2005 * April 2005 * March 2005 * February 2005 * January 2005 * December 2004 * November 2004 * October 2004 * September 2004 * August 2004 * July 2004 * June 2004 * May 2004 * April 2004 * March 2004 * February 2004 * January 2004 * December 2003 *